Archive for November, 2009

Let me just make this clear

November 30, 2009

The metaphysical absolute is the bear in the kitchen.

Proof of Infinity

November 30, 2009

Metaphysically, the knowlege of what something ‘is’ is impossible.

Or: No such thing exists as ‘the knowledge of what a thing is’.

Exaggerated Eyes

November 25, 2009

The typical big eyes of anime characters could be described as part of the feature set of a cultural emotional mask. (In big eyes = an emotionalism. Spock: “Emotion is exaggeration.”)

There is no naming of blanks

November 24, 2009

It is important that I should be able to put a name to a face.

The Face of Things

November 24, 2009

Part of me wants to admit that I ‘cannot recognise the face of things’ sometimes; so that despite being alive I do not see (or feel) that I am; such that there is no face to life, you could say.  Or perhaps what I mean is that I cannot recognise my own face despite its clarity before me – since I can only see it through others … where I only know myself in others in that they dictate who I am, in my mood and so on.  So that I am mechanically alive, just like a puppet: alive but not in me.

(Sometimes I chide myself with the thought: for heaven’s sake why don’t you use some of your inner resources as encouragement?  You should have a few of them by now!)

The Unfeatured Face

November 24, 2009

A film tells the story of a sentient computer.   Here one doesn’t imagine a face.  Or any face would do. Malicious or kind looking (for example), either would perform the same service in the expression of its machine mind since (as could be said) such a mind has no soul; it lacks the component that it can be recognised.  “For a machine is essentially faceless.”  (Imagine a kind-looking face overseeing some sort of cruel act.  Like locking the automatic doors of a burning building.  Where its mind takes on the guise of ‘anywhere / everywhere’.)

(Evil might be imagined as the annihilation of the human face.)

From Feet to Face

November 24, 2009

My eyes travel from feet to face.

Like a movie camera taking in a statuesque blond.

Magazine Robots

November 24, 2009

Suppose, I flip through a magazine: there is a photo of someone’s shoe clad feet. “Whose feet are those?” I ask myself. On the next page is the answer: the photo of someone – of their face. That is who the feet belong to. Imagine the same thing occuring with a pair of robot feet … Next page I see a metal visage. Is this the same sort of thing?

Or am I inclined to ask who the robot belongs to?

The American Dream

November 23, 2009

It is what American’s have: emotional simplicity.

Boo Boo

November 22, 2009

Emotionally we aspire to the condition of children.